Wib
(57%)
vs
42Crunch
(21%)
vs
Traceable AI
(96%)
Traceable AI is the leader in API Security. Unlike other API Security vendors, Traceable is focused on building a complete security platform that understands how an API application works. Attackers are now focusing on targeting an application’s business logic flaws and API vulnerabilities that can lead to sensitive data exfiltration. Understanding an application’s business logic is difficult and requires a security platform built to understand an application and how it operates in order to block sophisticated API attacks.
There are some key differences between Traceable AI, Wib and 42Crunch that can make a difference in protecting your organization’s sensitive data.
Traceable AI is the leader in API security and enables comprehensive protection for APIs including the Log4j/Log4Shell exploit.
Download the API Security Comparison Guide
API Security Requirements | Wib (57%) | 42Crunch (21%) | Traceable AI (96%) |
---|---|---|---|
API Discovery and Risk Management | |||
APIs Discovery | |||
Risk Scoring | |||
Change Detection | |||
Usage Analysis | Partial | ||
3rd Party API Risk | |||
Detection and Blocking of Attacks | |||
OWASP Top 10 attacks - WAF | |||
OWASP API Top 10 attacks | |||
DDoS Protection | |||
User Behavior Attacks | |||
User Identification & Behavior Analytics | |||
Bot Mitigation | |||
Fraud Detection | Partial | Partial | |
Data Flow Analytics | |||
Sensitive Data Flow | |||
Security Data Lake For Analytics & Threathunting | |||
Deployment | |||
Inline / Agent-based | |||
Out-of-Band/Agentless |
About this page:
This analysis and comparison is based on research of public-facing documentation and content and is intended to educate and inform the market about how different solutions address API security requirements. We welcome feedback to make this evaluation more accurate. If you see any errors, please click on the ‘Feedback’ button on the lower left of the page and we will update the page.