fbpx

Neosec

(68%)

vs

Salt Security

(50%)

vs

Traceable AI

(96%)

note: percent calculation based-on the number of API security requirements met vs unmet (partial = .5)

 

Traceable AI is the leader in API Security. Unlike other API Security vendors, Traceable is focused on building a complete security platform that understands how an API application works. Attackers are now focusing on targeting an application’s business logic flaws and API vulnerabilities that can lead to sensitive data exfiltration. Understanding an application’s business logic is difficult and requires a security platform built to understand an application and how it operates in order to block sophisticated API attacks.

There are some key differences between Traceable AI, Salt Security, and NeoSec that can make a difference in protecting your organization’s sensitive data.

Traceable AI is the leader in API security and enables comprehensive protection for APIs including the Log4j/Log4Shell exploit.

Download the API Security Comparison Guide

API Security RequirementsNeosec
(68%)
Salt Security
(50%)
Traceable AI
(96%)
API Discovery and Risk Management
APIs Discovery
Risk Scoring
Change Detection
Usage Analysis
3rd Party API Risk
Detection and Blocking of Attacks
OWASP Top 10 attacks - WAF
OWASP API Top 10 attacks
DDoS Protection
User Behavior Attacks
User Identification & Behavior Analytics
Bot Mitigation
Partial
Fraud Detection
Partial
Data Flow Analytics
Sensitive Data Flow
Security Data Lake For Analytics & Threathunting
Deployment
Inline / Agent-based
Out-of-Band/Agentless

About this page:

This analysis and comparison is based on research of public-facing documentation and content and is intended to educate and inform the market about how different solutions address API security requirements. We welcome feedback to make this evaluation more accurate.  If you see any errors, please click on the ‘Feedback’ button on the lower left of the page and we will update the page.  

Schedule a meeting to learn more about API Security.